Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: Vulnerability scanners


From: "Ken Smith" <ksmith () akibia com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:38:21 -0500


We have run Qualys test on a network using the Intranet scanning appliance, and it did indeed wreak havoc with a 
terminal server and a RAS server.  This is possible with any vulnerability scanning tool, so I would not assume that 
Qualys is immune.  

There are so many variables that can cause a device or system to misbehave, which may end up being due to the way the 
target host was configured.  For example, eEye prides themselves on being the safest assessment scanner that will not 
crash target systems.  During our first lab tests we were able to crash a server we were testing.  

Back to Qualys: The reporting includes baseline and trending functionality that is pretty good.  They have put quite an 
effort into data management.




-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Sharp [mailto:illectro2001 () yahoo com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:06 PM
To: oherrera () prodigy net mx; dan.lynch () placer ca gov;
pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Vulnerability scanners

They don't do active tests, so they don't exploit
known bugs and crash servers during testing. 


top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway.
SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses
and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much
junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial:
http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1


Current thread: