Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner)
From: "Mike Murray" <mmurray () ncircle com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:33:13 -0700
Let me state up front: I work for a competitor in the VA market, so I'm going to stay far away from any discussion on products, and try to stick with a bit of philosophy. I had one comment on something that Shawn said:
I know for a fact that they have some very skilled persons doing dev there. ... Just check some of their development discoveries that's gotta count for something!
While this is definitely an argument for the fact that a company has very smart people working for it (which is definitely not in question in eEye's case), I question the validity of the argument as far as the evaluation of a network VA tool. If the ability to discover new vulnerabilities were the gold standard for a good VA tool, we'd all be buying something that Dave Aitel wrote. While it is often given as a reason that one tool is better than another, it simply doesn't follow that an aptitude for discovering new vulnerabilities in code is the same as an aptitude for discovering known vulnerabilities in running services in the real world. IMHO, the skills are related, but significantly different. In my mind the analogy is similar to that of the difference between medical research and surgery. People who practice one extremely well don't usually practice the other to the same level, even though the skills (though not necessarily the mindsets) required to perform both are somewhat similar in many cases. One just happens to be focused on discovering new techniques out in the world, and the other happens to be focused on saving lives. My $0.02. M ------------------------------------------------- Michael Murray Director of Vulnerability and Exposure Research nCircle Network Security Office: 416-533-5305 ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner), (continued)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Román Ramírez (Apr 21)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Peter Wood (Apr 21)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Steve (Apr 21)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Bojan Zdrnja (Apr 22)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Steve (Apr 21)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Shawn Edwards (Apr 21)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Bobby . Clarke (Apr 22)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Cam Beasley, ISO (Apr 21)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Chris Hurley (Apr 21)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Lovrien, Scott (Apr 21)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Renaud Deraison (Apr 22)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Mike Murray (Apr 22)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Shawn Edwards (Apr 22)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Robert E. Lee (Apr 22)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Peter Benson (Apr 22)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Doty, Stephen (BearingPoint) (Apr 22)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Rainer Duffner (Apr 24)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Riley Hassell (Apr 22)
- Re: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) clarke-cummings () columbus rr com (Apr 23)
- RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Steve Goldsby (ICS) (Apr 26)
