Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Re[2]: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner)
From: "Chuck Fullerton" <chuckf69 () ceinetworks com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:49:43 -0400
My 2 cents on Okena (now Cisco Secure Agent). I worked for a Cisco Reseller when they bought the Okena product. I got to play with it extensively in order to support it for our customers. Overall I think the product went from A- to B. This is because Cisco had to make it compatable with their CiscoWorks product. In my humble opinion, it should have been the other way around. The CiscoWorks managment console is quirky, clumsy, and slow. It requires a kick-ass machine and it's still slow. If your familiar with CiscoWorks then by all means it's a great product. However, You shouldn't have to get a "Cisco College Degree" in order to use the product. Chuck Fullerton CISSP, OPST, CSS1, CCNP, CCDA, CNA, A+ -----Original Message----- From: Jason Ostrom [mailto:jpo () pobox com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 5:54 PM To: Marc Maiffret Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Re[2]: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Marc, I do agree with you when you said kernel protection systems alone are not enough, but I also think there is not a single silver bullet here, and the same can be said for any product. I would be interested to see how the eEye Blink IPS differs in regards to protecting against vulnerabilities specifically (rather than just exploits), and how this differs from Okena. << Marc Maiffret> Okena "works" because no one Marc Maiffret> knowledgeable has said otherwise. Okena has Marc Maiffret> taken the same flawed approach as Marc Maiffret> network IDS systems focusing on Marc Maiffret> protecting from exploits, and not Marc Maiffret> vulnerabilities specifically. Although Marc Maiffret> they have done so by doing detection of Marc Maiffret> exploits at the kernel level, Marc Maiffret> instead of at the network level.
To be fair to Okena, and all marketing aside, it does provide patch relief for most vulnerabilities, and isn't this adding an extra layer of security? I can also see the Security Policy compliance benefit in locking down the user groups with the rule-based behavior, i.e. Group A can not use Kazaa, Group B can only use Yahoo IM, etc. Jason ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Marc Maiffret (May 04)
- Re[2]: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Jason Ostrom (May 04)
- RE: Re[2]: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Chuck Fullerton (May 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Teicher, Mark (Mark) (May 04)
- RE: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Steve Goldsby (ICS) (May 04)
- Re[2]: Kernel sec. systems WAS: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner) Jason Ostrom (May 04)
