Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Nmap/netwag problem.
From: Pete Herzog <lists () isecom org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:10:06 +0200
Kaj,
Anyway. a 'full connect' scan (one that performs the complete three-way handshake will _always_ (?) be the most reliable. My sugeestion is to perform either a nmap connect scan on the ports from both results or to manually telnet to the ports and see the response.
I have to disagree with you here. A full connect scan is not the most reliable. There are many security defensive processes now which require proper protocol queries to provide a response- I see this very often with web ports. If you send anything other than a http request, you will not see a service behind the web port. The best method for scanning is always to verify responses of a service behind the ports by using the proper protocol. Barring that, verify the types of packets which return, the consistency of their return, delays in return, and the TTLs. But using telnet to visit a non-telnet port is no longer a reliable method. Depending on the responses to various types and configurations of packets within enumeration, you will be able to narrow down ports to those which respond predictably, those which don't, and those which respond oddly or under peculiar circumstances. Then you re-focus your test on that information. You shouldn't care about the tool and which one is right. Care about the process and if how you are looking for it is right. If your process is sound and you know how to investigate properly, you'll stop wondering which tool to believe. *Sigh* Me, I blame the tools and techniques classes for all this misinformation about testing. I wish they'd stop teaching crappy ethical hacking classes with loads of tools (but you get to keep the CD set of a billion tools you don't need too!!) and start focusing on teaching the process. Too much bad information out there on how to test. Which reminds me: OSSTMM 3.0 RC8 was just released for review. Final release is set at RC12 so grab that when you can. You can get some good professional testing insight from there. Sincerely, -pete. -- Pete Herzog - Managing Director ISECOM - Institute for Security and Open Methodologies www.isecom.org - www.osstmm.org www.hackerhighschool.org - www.isestorm.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FREE WHITE PAPER - Wireless LAN Security: What Hackers Know That You Don't Learn the hacker's secrets that compromise wireless LANs. Secure your WLAN by understanding these threats, available hacking tools and proven countermeasures. Defend your WLAN against man-in-the-Middle attacks and session hijacking, denial-of-service, rogue access points, identity thefts and MAC spoofing. Request your complimentary white paper at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/AirDefense_pen-test_050801 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Nmap/netwag problem. Aleph One (Aug 09)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. James Riden (Aug 10)
- RE: Nmap/netwag problem. Irene Abezgauz (Aug 10)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Kaj Huisman (Aug 10)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Pete Herzog (Aug 10)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Bill Weiss (Aug 11)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Kaj Huisman (Aug 11)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Rogan Dawes (Aug 11)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Pete Herzog (Aug 11)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Irene Abezgauz (Aug 11)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Daniel Miessler (Aug 12)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Pete Herzog (Aug 12)
- Re: Nmap/netwag problem. Pete Herzog (Aug 10)
- RE: Nmap/netwag problem. Omar Herrera (Aug 11)
