Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Some new SSH exploit script?
From: silentw <silentw () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:26:58 +1000
Running a service on a non-standard port yields zero increase in security. That was my point.
I completely disagree for several reasons. There has been much talk about the number of connections on port 22. thousands of random connections that just waste your time. If you dont have a guessable password why do you care ? reasurces. 1) It wastes your resorces. If your logs arn't full of usless crap you have more time, more money, more hardware that you can better spend elseware on things that will actually help you. 2) Security through obscurity is a legitimate part of defense in depth. (in this case) If you keep your services up to date, a non-standard port could save you from a 0day attack / worm / n00b. that is an increase in security. It really (for me, anyway) comes down to reasources - if you can cut the junk in your logs by 90% just by changing a port, it is worth considering. Anyone who has working in a large environment will know exactly what I mean. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: CenzicConcerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Some new SSH exploit script?, (continued)
- RE: Some new SSH exploit script? Sekurity Wizard (Jun 03)
- Re: Re: Some new SSH exploit script? anony (Jun 04)
- Re: Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Jarrod Frates (Jun 05)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Adam.Chesnutt (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Jarrod Frates (Jun 05)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Jurriaans, Marco (Jun 05)
- RE: Some new SSH exploit script? Michael Sierchio (Jun 06)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Larry Offley (Jun 06)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Adam.Chesnutt (Jun 07)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Robert E. Lee (Jun 08)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Adam.Chesnutt (Jun 09)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Larry Offley (Jun 06)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? silentw (Jun 07)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Adam.Chesnutt (Jun 07)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Thor (Hammer of God) (Jun 07)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Steve Smith (Jun 08)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Pete Fuggle (Jun 08)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? R. DuFresne (Jun 08)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? Paul Robertson (Jun 09)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? R. DuFresne (Jun 09)
- Re: Some new SSH exploit script? litch (Jun 07)
- Unix auditing tools - Windows based. Serge Vondandamo (Jun 08)
- Re: Unix auditing tools - Windows based. Sol Invictus (Jun 08)
