Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Pen Test and Sec Org
From: Justin Townsend <justin.townsend () i-assure com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 10:52:37 -0500
I work for many customers that are set up in a similar manner, and would heartily recommend it. The core concept is to
have a separation of duties, with one party performing the engineering/operation, and the other party providing the
security requirements and assessing the system to determine any gap between implementation and requirements. This helps
to avoid a conflict of interest where an engineer is assessing their own work. This is a pretty standard setup in
mature security organizations. As for standards (United States federal, at least,) I would check out the NIST Special
Publications series, specifically "SP 800-100 Information Security Handbook: A Guide for Managers." It's a solid
overview of an entire security organization. It's tailored for US federal systems, but most of the theory applies to
any larger organization.
All that said, I would put the pen tests under the "Information Security" group in your model.
Justin Townsend
I-Assure, LLC | Defense In Depth Solutions
justin.townsend () i-assure com
________________________________________
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Soso Aboso [sosokkam () yahoo com]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:54 AM
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Pen Test and Sec Org
I am also very interseting on how to split the rsponsibilities
----- Original Message ----
From: Soso Aboso <sosokkam () yahoo com>
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2008 12:26:01 PM
Subject: Pen Test and Sec Org
Greetings,
In the organization I work for there are two security team, one with enterprise role “Information Security” and their
mean focus on governance, awareness, and risk assessment. The second team is for IT “IT Security” and their mean focus
on IT security projects and managing the security Devices. The question I have, did any of you came through such
organization structure, is it recommended, what standards support such security organization, who should be the owner
of penetration tests in such organization?
Thanks you in advance for your feedback
Regards
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Pen Test and Sec Org Soso Aboso (May 05)
- Re: Pen Test and Sec Org Joey Peloquin (May 06)
- Re: Pen Test and Sec Org DaKahuna (May 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Pen Test and Sec Org Soso Aboso (May 05)
- Re: Pen Test and Sec Org Joshua Gimer (May 06)
- RE: Pen Test and Sec Org Justin Townsend (May 06)
