Politech mailing list archives
FC: Illegal NSA spying? It won't be the first time -- a look at history
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:27:02 -0500
Spies Left Out in the Cold
by Declan McCullagh (declan () wired com)
3:00 a.m. 13.Dec.1999 PST
It's enough to spook any spy. Congress
plans to hold hearings next year that will,
for the first time in a quarter century,
investigate whether the National Security
Agency is too zealous for our own good.
Much has changed since those hearings
in 1975. Instead of being a place so
secretive that the Department of Justice
once abandoned a key prosecution rather
than reveal the National Security
Agency's existence in court, "the Fort"
has become enmeshed in popular culture.
Techno-thrillers like Enemy of the State,
Mercury Rising, Sneakers, and even
cut-rate TV series like UPN's 7 Days
regularly depict NSA officials -- to their
chagrin -- as eavesdrop-happy Nixonites.
But one thing has remained the same.
The agency is barred from spying inside
the United States and is supposed to
snoop only on international
communications. Through a system
reportedly named Echelon, it distributes
reports on its findings to the US
government and its foreign allies.
Do those findings include intercepted
email messages and faxes sent by
Americans to Americans? Maybe, and
that's what's causing all the fuss.
News articles on Echelon have captured
the zeitgeist of the moment, spurred
along by PR stunts like "Jam Echelon" day.
Newsweek reported this week that the
NSA is going to "help the FBI track
terrorists and criminals in the United
States." (The agency denied it.) A 6
December New Yorker article also
wondered about the future of Fort George
Meade.
That future could look a lot like the past:
congressional action that, in the end,
doesn't amount to much. For this article,
Wired News reviewed the original
documents and transcripts from the
Church committee hearings that took
place in the Watergate-emboldened
Senate in 1975. The Select Committee to
Study Governmental Operations with
Respect to Intelligence Activities
published its final report in April 1976.
It wasn't an easy process. NSA defenders
tried their best to kick the public out of
the hearing room and hold the sessions
behind closed doors.
"I believe the release of communications
intelligence information can cause harm
to the national security," complained
Senator Barry Goldwater, a Republican
who voted against disclosing information
on illicit NSA surveillance procedures and
refused to sign the final report.
"The public's right to know must be
responsibly weighed against the impact of
release on the public's right to be
secure.... Disclosures could severely
cripple or even destroy the vital
capabilities of this indispensible safeguard
to our nation's security," said another
senator.
But Democratic Senator Frank Church and
his allies on the committee prevailed, and
disclosed enough information to give any
Americans the privacy jitters. Among the
findings:
Shamrock: In 1945, the NSA's
predecessor coerced Western Union, RCA,
and ITT Communications to turn over
telegraph traffic to the Feds. The project
was codenamed Shamrock. "Cooperation
may be expected for the complete
intercept coverage of this material," an
internal agency memo said.
James Earl Ray: When the Feds wanted
to find the suspect in the Martin Luther
King Jr. assassination, they turned to the
NSA. Frank Raven, chief of the G Group,
received a direct order in May 1968 to
place Ray's name on the watch list. It
turned up nothing and Ray was eventually
nabbed in London, Raven said when
interviewed for the book The Puzzle
Palace. At another point the FBI
demanded complete NSA surveillance of
all Quakers, in the mistaken belief that
the group was shipping food to Vietnam.
Huston plan: Tom Charles Huston, an
aide to H.R. Haldeman, organized a
meeting in June 1970 between Nixon and
his agency chiefs, including the FBI, CIA,
NSA, and Defense Intelligence Agency.
According to the Nixon papers, the
president wanted to collected intelligence
about "revolutionary activism." The
presidential directive that came out of
that meeting ordered the NSA to expand
its surveillance and evaluate "domestic
intelligence."
Peace activists: At the Pentagon's
request, the NSA monitored the
communications of '60s peace activists.
The order came from the military unit
responsible for quelling "civil
disturbances," which wanted to know if
foreign agents were "controlling or
attempting to control or influence
activities of US 'peace' groups and 'black
power' orgs." An internal NSA memo
creating the Minaret project said it would
focus on people involved in "anti-war
movements/demonstrations."
[...]
Second half of article available at:
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,33026,00.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
To subscribe: send a message to majordomo () vorlon mit edu with this text:
subscribe politech
More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: Illegal NSA spying? It won't be the first time -- a look at history Declan McCullagh (Dec 13)
