Politech mailing list archives
FC: Government wants Microsoft split up and, until then, regulated
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:09:37 -0700
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36000,00.html Government Wants Control of MS by Declan McCullagh (declan () wired com) 3:00 a.m. Apr. 29, 2000 PDT BELLEVUE, Washington -- If Bill Gates was unhappy with early reports of the government's antitrust punishments, he's going to be plenty steamed when he reads the fine print this weekend. In two lengthy filings on Friday, government attorneys said they eventually hope to carve up Microsoft into two huge chunks. But until that happens, their 40KB proposal would impose extraordinarily strict government regulations on what the world's largest software company may and may not do. For instance: * Microsoft wouldn't be able to sell computer makers discounted copies of Windows, except for foreign language translations, but would be ordered to open a "secure" lab where other firms may examine the previously internal Windows specifications. * Microsoft wouldn't be able to give discounts to hardware or software developers in exchange for promoting or distributing other company products. For instance, Microsoft would be banned from inking a discount deal with CompUSA to bundle a copy of Microsoft Flight Simulator with a Microsoft joystick. * Microsoft would have to create a new executive position and a new committee on its board of directors. The "chief compliance officer" would report to the chief executive officer and oversee a staff devoted to ensuring compliance with the new government rules. * If Microsoft hoped to start discarding old emails after its bad experiences during the trial, it wouldn't be able to do so. "Microsoft shall, with the supervision of the chief compliance officer, maintain for a period of at least four years the email of all Microsoft officers, directors and managers engaged in software development, marketing, sales, and developer relations related to platform software," the government's proposed regulations say. * Microsoft would have to monitor all changes it makes to all versions of Windows and track any alterations that would slow down or "degrade the performance of" any third-party application such as Internet browsers, email client software, multimedia viewing software, instant messaging software, and voice recognition software. If it does not notify the third-party developer, criminal sanctions would apply. * State and federal government lawyers could come onto Microsoft's campus here "during office hours" to "inspect and copy" any relevant document, email message, collection of source code or other related information. * The same state and federal government lawyers would be allowed to question any Microsoft employee "without restraint or interference." [...] http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35953,00.html So, Judge, What's the Call? by Declan McCullagh (declan () wired com) 3:00 a.m. Apr. 28, 2000 PDT When government attorneys file their proposed punishment in the Microsoft antitrust case on Friday, they should expect a warm reception. Ever since Microsoft's latest antitrust woes began three years ago, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson has sided with the government on every important legal point.[...]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: Government wants Microsoft split up and, until then, regulated Declan McCullagh (Apr 29)
