FC: Reply to "How bad is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act?"

[Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>]

Previous Politech message:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-03907.html
---

Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:08:21 -0400
Subject: The DMCA's potential impact on computer science research
From: Peter Harsha <harsha () cra org>
To: <declan () well com>

Declan,

For Politech, if you'd like. In response to your column on DMCA at News.com.
Copy also sent to letters () news com.

Thanks,

Peter Harsha

=====

Declan McCullagh misses the boat at least twice in his August 19th
column concerning the potential impact on computer science research of
the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ["Debunking DMCA myths," c|net
News.Com, http://news.com.com/2010-12-950229.html].

First, the DMCA has two arms: one that prohibits devices that circumvent
copy protection, and one that prohibits acts of circumvention.  The
research conducted by Professor Felten and his colleagues took place
prior to the time when the "acts of circumvention" provisions became
effective in October 2000.  Thus, these provisions did not apply to that
research.  However, there is little doubt in the legal community that
this research, and similar research, would be illegal under the "acts of
circumvention" provisions.  Declan fails to recognize this arm of the
DMCA in his column.

Second, the chilling effect of the DMCA cannot be described by the
probability of conviction alone.  One must also consider the magnitude
of the exposure if convicted.  Because the "acts of circumvention"
provisions of the DMCA were not in effect at the time of the Felten
research, the probability of an adverse judgment was indeed small.
However, a group of highly respected legal consultants told Felten's
employer that the cost of an adverse judgment could be truly enormous.
The combination of these two factors had a very substantial chilling
effect.  (It is also the case that two individuals were likely to lose
their jobs if the paper was published.  This illustrates the human
dimension of the chilling effect.)

Other issues, on which we shall not elaborate, include the
anti-dissemination provisions of the DMCA, and the civil (in addition to
criminal) provisions.

It is disruptive to the progress of research when scientists must first
consult with attorneys to determine if previously legitimate research
might be in violation of the DMCA.  We are happy to agree with Declan
that "The DMCA is ... an egregious law ... and should be unceremoniously
tossed out by the courts."

Edward W. Felten
Princeton University

Edward D. Lazowska
University of Washington; Co-chair, Computing Research Association
Government Affairs Committee

Barbara Simons
Co-chair, ACM US Public Policy Committee

(Forwarded by)
--
Peter Harsha
Director of Government Affairs
Computing Research Association
1100 17th St, NW Suite 507
Washington, DC 20036-4632
202-478-6135 (new)
fax: 202-478-6313 (new)
mobile: 202-352-8105 (new)
http://www.cra.org




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
CNET Radio 9:40 am ET weekdays: http://cnet.com/broadband/0-7227152.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------