Anyone else seen this?

[Kevin Brown <Kevin.M.Brown () asu edu>]

I currently have just one sensor on the network (that I control) logging to
a Postgresql (7.1) database.  I have been noticing that the dates being put
in the database do not always correspond with the actual time and was
wondering if anyone else is having this problem.

Running:
-*> Snort! <*-
Version 1.8-beta5 (Build 24)
on Solaris 8 (Netra T1 AC200, 500MHz Sparc)

Remote Database, Postgresql 7.1 running on RH6.2 kernel 2.2.16
Schema 102
Acid .9.6b10

Attached is a sampling of the output from the following SQL queries

snort=# select sid,cid,timestamp from event ORDER BY timestamp DESC;
snort=# select sid,cid,timestamp from event ORDER BY cid DESC;

Any help would be much appreciated.

Begin Geek Code;
$_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c
^=(
$m=(11,10,116,100,11,122,20,100)[$_/16%8])&110;$t^=(72,@z=(64,72,$a^=12*($_%
16
-2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?12:0,@z)[$_%8]}(16..271);if((@a=unx"C*",$_)[20]&48){$
h
=5;$_=unxb24,join"",@b=map{xB8,unxb8,chr($_^$a[--$h+84])}@ARGV;s/...$/1$&/;$
d=unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256|(ord$b[4])<<9|ord$b[3];$d=$d>>8^($f=$t&($d>>12^$d>>4^
$d^$d/8))<<17,$e=$e>>8^($t&($g=($q=$e>>14&7^$e)^$q*8^$q<<6))<<9,$_=$t[$_]^
(($h>>=8)+=$f+(~$g&$t))for@a[128..$#a]}print+x"C*",@a}';s/x/pack+/g;eval

Attachment: snortdb.txt
Description: