Snort mailing list archives
redundant rules
From: "Watson, Ed" <ewatson () academic com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:27:14 -0700
The default rules don't seem to pick up port scans, even obvious ones. I
thought if I used the vision.rules, that would be more effective, and it
hasn't. Could redundant rules cause it to not log these events?
1166 rules read...
1166 Option Chains linked into 257 Chain Headers
0 Dynamic rules
System
Dell 1550
dual PIII 833
1gb ram
100baseTX FDX
Resource usage
Mem .6%
CPU .1%
OS
RH7
Ed Watson
Current thread:
- redundant rules Watson, Ed (May 10)
- Re: redundant rules Martin Roesch (May 10)
