Snort mailing list archives
MD5 sums for each CodeRed version (was "A new variation of CodeRed???????????")
From: "Stephen W. Thompson" <thompson () pobox upenn edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
Let's be a little more specific. Since the names of the various Code Reds have gotten confused, how about using MD5 checksums? I looked a bit, expecting people to naturally share MD5's for each variant, but I've only seen one so far, in a post by corecode (corecode () corecode ath cx) in the Incidents list at securityfocus.com. Lacking such a list, it's easy for us to confuse each other even more. Look at these selections from a recent posting to snort-users, taken out of context:
What you forwarded looks just like what I've been calling CodeRedII. It's the one with the backdoor.
Nope. It's different. Look at offset 0f0 & 1b0 and you will see some obvious differences in the payload.
There are many other differences if you look closely.
Rather than that, we might just say, for example, "in
looking at Code Red md5=5edc2375e7aca69f8c1a8d77c4ffff18
I noticed ...".
Please point me to other, perhaps more complete lists such as this one.
"Ma" stands for which of my two machines I collected it on. These
were collected merely with
nc -v -v -l -p 80 >catch80.`date "+%s"`
on a Linux box. In those cases where I use the convention, the
filename has the time value (in the usual Un*x convention) when
the process started, and the timestamp is when I killed the
process. The actual connection is presumably between those two
times. This is local time, EDT ( -0400 ).
En paz,
Steve, security analyst
Code Red I, based on reported size WITHOUT headers:
Timestamp
Ma MD5 Filename Size when I killed nc
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AP 2e5e171cdc8bdf35cbd8b4b9376ce740 catch80.s 4039 12 Aug 02:06 -0400
PR 184a9d098041d390a0a4044c0581147b port80.997732416 4039 13 Aug 16:07 -0400
PR 3f9ee5e3edaea47ecbef302b125fe562 port80.997809456 4039 14 Aug 13:24 -0400
Code Red II, based on reported size WITHOUT headers:
Timestamp
Ma MD5 Filename Size when nc started
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AP 5edc2375e7aca69f8c1a8d77c4ffff18 catch80.997460492 3818 10 Aug 13:38 -0400
$ cmp -l port80.997732416 port80.997809456
3285 320 54
3286 362 67
3287 32 50
3289 365 204
3290 30 62
3291 373 3
3292 164 165
3293 363 323
3294 102 31
3295 103 102
3297 0 126
3298 0 64
3299 0 22
3300 0 270
3333 12 352
3334 67 15
3335 103 102
$ cmp -l port80.997732416 catch80.s
3285 320 54
3286 362 67
3287 32 50
3289 365 204
3290 30 62
3291 373 3
3292 164 165
3293 363 223
3294 102 7
3295 103 102
3298 0 1
3333 12 362
3334 67 41
3335 103 323
$ cmp -l catch80.s port80.997809456
3293 223 323
3294 7 31
3297 0 126
3298 1 64
3299 0 22
3300 0 270
3333 362 352
3334 41 15
3335 323 102
--
Stephen W. Thompson, UPenn, ISC Information Security, 215-898-1236, WWW has PGP
thompson () isc upenn edu URL=http://pobox.upenn.edu/~thompson/index.html
For security matters, use security () isc upenn edu, read by InfoSec staff
The only safe choice: Write e-mail as if it's public. Cuz it could be.
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- A new variation of CodeRed??????????? John Davey (Aug 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A new variation of CodeRed??????????? Neil Dickey (Aug 16)
- RE: A new variation of CodeRed??????????? John Davey (Aug 16)
- MD5 sums for each CodeRed version (was "A new variation of CodeRed???????????") Stephen W. Thompson (Aug 16)
- RE: A new variation of CodeRed??????????? John Davey (Aug 16)
- RE: A new variation of CodeRed??????????? Neil Dickey (Aug 16)
