RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole?

[Frank Knobbe <FKnobbe () KnobbeITS com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramin Alidousti [mailto:ramin () cannon eng us uu net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 4:46 PM
>
> What if you'd bring some part of the snort functionality in 
> the kernel.
> I'm just thinking outloud though. What other options do we have to
> eliminate the buffer overflow flaw?

Since snort is open-source (as is pcap), that shouldn't be too hard.
;) Feel free to look through the code and check for any unchecked
buffer handling...

Frank

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
Comment: PGP or S/MIME encrypted email preferred.

iQA/AwUBO04m8ZytSsEygtEFEQKX3ACcCpy5JuHV2E63NSXMC8O6GwOaxkQAn1xF
ro8b9rg1yIH5GR9d9dNS1SXr
=ovdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users