Snort mailing list archives
non-CIDR address masking in rules?
From: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt () rice edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:58:58 -0600 (CST)
Is there a way to use address/mask pairs explicitly in a rule, rather than
CIDR notation? Particularly, does snort have the capability to understand
address/mask pairs that *don't* simplify to CIDR notation, eg:
172.16.4.0 0.0.8.255 => 172.16.4.0/24 or 172.16.12.0/24
or
172.16.0.250 0.0.255.15 => anything in 172.16.0.0/16 with a last
octet > 239
?
-g
Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt
Rice University Network Management
glratt () rice edu
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- non-CIDR address masking in rules? Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt (Nov 05)
- Re: non-CIDR address masking in rules? Andrew R. Baker (Nov 06)
