Snort mailing list archives
Any suggestions to lower drop rates on this setup?
From: "Crow, Owen" <Owen_Crow () bmc com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 16:26:06 -0600
I'm having high drop-rates on the following setup and would like some
suggestions:
OS: FreeBSD-4-STABLE
System: HP Kayak XA, Intel PII, 300MHz, 48MB RAM
Interface: xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xfcc0-0xfcff irq 9
at device 6.0 on pci0
Snort: 1.8.3
Command line: /usr/local/bin/snort -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -l
/var/log/snort -u snort -g snort -i xl0
Output options in snort.conf: log_tcpdump and alert_fast
Output from startup is:
Log directory = /var/log/snort
Initializing Network Interface xl0
WARNING: OpenPcap() device xl0 network lookup:
xl0: no IPv4 address assigned
--== Initializing Snort ==--
Decoding Ethernet on interface xl0
Initializing Preprocessors!
Initializing Plug-ins!
Initializating Output Plugins!
Parsing Rules file /etc/snort/snort.conf
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Initializing rule chains...
Back Orifice detection brute force: DISABLED
Stream4 config:
Stateful inspection: ACTIVE
Session statistics: INACTIVE
Session timeout: 30 seconds
Session memory cap: 8388608 bytes
State alerts: INACTIVE
Scan alerts: ACTIVE
Log Flushed Streams: INACTIVE
No arguments to stream4_reassemble, setting defaults:
Reassemble client: ACTIVE
Reassemble server: INACTIVE
Reassemble ports: 21 23 25 53 80 143 110 111 513
Reassembly alerts: ACTIVE
No arguments to frag2 directive, setting defaults to:
Fragment timeout: 60 seconds
Fragment memory cap: 4194304 bytes
ProcessFileOption: /var/log/snort/alert.fast
885 Snort rules read...
885 Option Chains linked into 108 Chain Headers
0 Dynamic rules
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
After an hour, kill -USR1 obtains this output:
============================================================================
===
Snort analyzed 19324136 out of 34336368 packets, dropping 15012232(43.721%)
packets
Breakdown by protocol: Action Stats:
TCP: 3910974 (11.390%) ALERTS: 2
UDP: 328005 (0.955%) LOGGED: 2
ICMP: 63215 (0.184%) PASSED: 0
ARP: 2984 (0.009%)
IPv6: 0 (0.000%)
IPX: 85 (0.000%)
OTHER: 6490 (0.019%)
DISCARD: 0 (0.000%)
============================================================================
===
Fragmentation Stats:
Fragmented IP Packets: 2636 (0.008%)
Fragment Trackers: 1321
Rebuilt IP Packets: 2605
Frag elements used: 5234
Discarded(incomplete): 0
Discarded(timeout): 28
Frag2 memory faults: 0
============================================================================
===
TCP Stream Reassembly Stats:
TCP Packets Used: 3910856 (11.390%)
Stream Trackers: 80056
Stream flushes: 6580
Segments used: 23926
Stream4 Memory Faults: 0
============================================================================
===
So I'm dealing with about 9500 packets per second on average.
Here's a typical top output:
last pid: 4410; load averages: 1.00, 1.00, 0.93 up 2+04:44:41
16:19:51
31 processes: 2 running, 29 sleeping
CPU states: 91.1% user, 0.4% nice, 0.0% system, 8.5% interrupt, 0.0%
idle
Mem: 21M Active, 5412K Inact, 13M Wired, 2676K Cache, 14M Buf, 16M Free
Swap: 132M Total, 16K Used, 132M Free
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
4249 snort 59 0 8876K 8384K RUN 78:04 99.02% 99.02% snort
I'd like to get that drop percentage down. Does anyone have hardware or
software suggestions? I'm trying to drink from a fire hose here and need
all the help I can get. So far I've throttled the GigE traffic down to
100Mbit via a switch, but I'd eventually like to go GigE. It looks like
this hardware is completely inadequate for even 100Mbit traffic. I've also
tuned the kernel according to hints found at
http://www.daemonnews.org/200108/benchmark.html. The tuning has had no
visible effect (drop levels are still 40-50% over the course of 24 hours).
Thanks,
Owen Crow
Systems Programmer (Unix)
BMC Software, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Any suggestions to lower drop rates on this setup? Crow, Owen (Dec 20)
- Re: Any suggestions to lower drop rates on this setup? Chris Green (Dec 21)
- Re: Any suggestions to lower drop rates on this setup? Matt Kettler (Dec 22)
