Snort mailing list archives
[2]'kill snort-pid -USR1' returns unrealistic figures
From: Bruno Vuillemin <Bruno.Vuillemin () unifr ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:44:48 +0100
Hello everybody,
After a first mail about the fact that
"kill snort-pid -USR1" generated very unlikely statistics
I got some advice about libpcap etc. Thanks.
So :
I upgraded the linux system (Red Hat 7.2)
(applied all current patch rpms)
to kernel 2.4.9-21
I removed the redhat libpcap rpm
I installed libpcap 0.7.1 (from www.tcpdump.org)
I upgraded snort to 1.8.3
The monitored ethernet card uses the driver eepro100
/etc/modules.conf contains among other lines
alias eth0 eepro100
I didn't recompiled the new kernel after reading
lipcap 0.7.1 README.linux and its remark about
packet socket, because I got no complain from snort
or the system. Since it is not a module
I think it is already included in the kernel...
And again the figures show something wrong...
(16'2213 214.539% can't compare to the total 75'603).
Hence there's a doubt in my mind, /proc/net/dev show
no problem to get the packets... but what about snort ?
Any comments ? Thanks.
Bruno Vuillemin, computer service, University of Fribourg/Freiburg,
Switzerland.
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: =============================================
==================================
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Snort analyzed 75603 out of 75610 packets,
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: dropping 7(0.009%) packets
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Breakdown by protocol: Action
Stats:
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: TCP: 162213 (214.539%) ALERTS:
48
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: UDP: 649 (0.858%) LOGGED:
28
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: ICMP: 139 (0.184%) PASSED:
0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: ARP: 603 (0.798%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: IPv6: 0 (0.000%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: IPX: 0 (0.000%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: OTHER: 1099 (1.454%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: DISCARD: 0 (0.000%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: ===============================================
================================
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Fragmentation Stats:
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Fragmented IP Packets: 0 (0.000%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Fragment Trackers: 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Rebuilt IP Packets: 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Frag elements used: 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Discarded(incomplete): 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Discarded(timeout): 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Frag2 memory faults: 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: ===============================================
================================
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: TCP Stream Reassembly Stats:
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: TCP Packets Used: 162212
(214.538%)
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Stream Trackers: 4398
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Stream flushes: 351
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Segments used: 924
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: Stream4 Memory Faults: 0
Feb 21 16:34:17 snortBox snort: ===============================================
================================
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- [2]'kill snort-pid -USR1' returns unrealistic figures Bruno Vuillemin (Feb 21)
