Snort mailing list archives
RE: ignoring a host
From: "McCammon, Keith" <Keith.McCammon () eadvancemed com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 10:52:30 -0500
You could put it in the command line using a "and not host" statement, or you could write a pass rule and start Snort with the -o option, so that pass is processed first. Either way should work. Personally, I would recommend the pass option, as there may be certain types off traffic sourced from the firewall that you would want to generate an alert. Creating detailed pass rules for known, valid traffic would help to clean up your alerts, while not totally ignoring your firewall. Remember, firewall's get compromised, too! -----Original Message----- From: Fontenot, Paul [mailto:Paul.Fontenot () bannerhealth com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:41 AM To: Snort (E-mail) Subject: [Snort-users] ignoring a host I have the following configuration: a firewall, a snort box. snort has one leg inside the firewall and a non-ip'd leg on a recieve only cable monitoring the firewall port. Is there a way to ignore the firewall as a source ip? paul _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- ignoring a host Fontenot, Paul (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ignoring a host McCammon, Keith (Mar 01)
