Snort mailing list archives
Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot
From: "Kurt Seifried" <bugtraq () seifried org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:20:27 -0700
Kind of, it simply sends reponses, but holds the tcp window open for as long as possible, the theory being that if a sizable percentage of people ran labrea scans, probes and attacks would take a lot longer. Problem is most scans can simply have a timeout (--host_timeout in nmap) and attacks won't really care since most are automated (ala code red/nimda). What would helps is if you have a network, someone scans it stealthily (let's say 1 packet per day), when they try to attack they will end up attacking non-existent services/systems hopefully creating more noise that you can catch. Ultimately if you can a netblock and every single address responds with let's say 10 ports open attacking them is going to be very very noisy. Problem with Labrea is it really only works if lots and lots of people deploy it. With something like fake scan answers that immediately helps protect you. Kurt Seifried, kurt () seifried org A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574 http://seifried.org/security/ http://www.idefense.com/digest.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Porter, Ph.D." <tporter () dtool com> To: "'Kurt Seifried'" <bugtraq () seifried org>; "'Lance Spitzner'" <lance () honeynet org>; "'Snort-Users (E-mail)'" <snort-users () lists sourceforge net>; <honeypots () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:12 PM Subject: RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot
Doesn't Labrae work on this principal? Thomas Porter, Ph.D. ScorpionPoint Security
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Lance Spitzner (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Kurt Seifried (Mar 07)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Thomas Porter, Ph.D. (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Kurt Seifried (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot David Watson (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot nfudd (Mar 08)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Thomas Porter, Ph.D. (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Brian Caswell (Mar 07)
- RE: Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Chris Grout (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ian O'Brien (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Jim Forster (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot John Kinsella (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Gideon Lenkey (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Kerberus (Mar 08)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Kurt Seifried (Mar 07)
