Snort mailing list archives
Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot
From: "George Bakos" <gbakos () ists dartmouth edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:02:16 -0400
Dude, Using iptables and nc, you not only don't need a box, but can pull initial commands, as well: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d <unused ip address(es)> -j REDIRECT --to-ports 6666 while true; do nc -w 2 -l -p 6666 2>/dev/null >> /var/log/datafile; done The connection is established, and only survives while there is data present. Snort can pull the whole kit 'n kaboodle and you can ditch the redirect, unless you like redundancy. You might want to mark time in the datafile, to aid in correlation. If you aren't comfortable with netcat, any listener will do. On 7 Mar 2002 at 22:34, thus spake Lance Spitzner:
Of course this does not give you the Data Capture capabilites of a honeypot, as there is no system for the attacker to interact with. However, this could be used to help detect scanning or probing activity. Thoughts?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ George Bakos alpinista () bigfoot com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot, (continued)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Jim Forster (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot John Kinsella (Mar 07)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Gideon Lenkey (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Kerberus (Mar 08)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Rick Francis (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Edward Balas (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Frank Knobbe (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Frank Knobbe (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot James Hoagland (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot George Bakos (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Martin Roesch (Mar 08)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Jason Robertson (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ofir Arkin (Mar 09)
- Re: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Fyodor (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Dan Hollis (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ryan Russell (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ofir Arkin (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Ryan Russell (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Earthlink (Mar 09)
- RE: VERY simple 'virtual' honeypot Alex Collins (Mar 08)
