Snort mailing list archives
Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet
From: "Mark Cooper" <mark () mhc-online co uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:33:57 -0000
Bill, This is nowhere near as creative as John Sage's answer but, IIRC, v1.8.3 had a bug in the calculation of the packet size, or similar. Which version are you running? For info on the bug, posted 18/12/2001: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=494701&group_id=335 7&atid=103357 Regards, Mark Cooper _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet Bill McCarty (Mar 22)
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet John Sage (Mar 23)
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet Bill McCarty (Mar 23)
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet John Sage (Mar 23)
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet Bill McCarty (Mar 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet Mark Cooper (Mar 25)
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet Bill McCarty (Mar 25)
- Re: MISC Large ICMP Packet alert on small ICMP packet John Sage (Mar 23)
