Snort mailing list archives
RE: Snort, Stream4 State and Ethernet Taps.
From: "Wirth, Jeff" <WirthJe () DNB com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:34:28 -0400
From: larosa, vjay [mailto:larosa_vjay () emc com]
I was just thinking about something, If I have an ethernet full duplex 100 Mb link, and I insert an ethernet tap that splits the full duplex link in to two half duplex streams, then run two seperate instances of snort to monitor each half duplex link. How will this affect the Stream 4 preprocessor with regards to TCP state? If the initial syn goes out past one snort process, the syn-ack comes back in past the second snort process and the final ack in the TCP three way handshake goes out past snort process 1 again. Will snort ignore this conversation now and not pass on the packets for rules parsing becuase the handshake was not seen entirely by one snort process? Or will Stream 4 assume bi-directional flow is in play on each process because process 1 saw the syn as well as the ack, and process 2 saw a syn-ack?
Take a look at the mail archive. There was a tread on this topic last week... http://sourceforge.net/search/?type=mlists&exact=1&q=taps&offset=25&group_id =3357&forum_id=3972 - Jeff
Current thread:
- Snort, Stream4 State and Ethernet Taps. larosa, vjay (Apr 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Snort, Stream4 State and Ethernet Taps. Wirth, Jeff (May 01)
- Alerting Snort (sending alert through pager) Alwin Raymundo (May 03)
- RE: Snort, Stream4 State and Ethernet Taps. counter . spy (May 01)
- RE: Snort, Stream4 State and Ethernet Taps. larosa, vjay (May 01)
- RE: Snort, Stream4 State and Ethernet Taps. counter . spy (May 01)
