Re: spp_portscan behavior is 1.8.6

[Edwin Eefting <edwin () bit nl>]

On Wed, 22 May 2002 17:25:52 -0700 Ryan Hill <rhill () xypoint com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Is spp_portscan designed to report STEALTH scan detections regardless of
> the
> preprocessor ignore-hosts directive?
>
> I've got an IP which generates STEALTH packets and spp_portscan is
> reporting
> the event despite the fact the IP is entered into the ignore-hosts list
> and
> am wondering why this activity isn't being ignored.

I got this problem to. It seems the new code is still missing some if-blocks
that should look at these settings, before calling the log functions. 
I just hacked them into the source at certain
points and commented some stuff out.

> Thanks,
>
> Ryan Hill
> Corporate Information Systems
> TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (TCS) - http://www.telecomsys.com


-- 
                              __________________
Met vriendelijke groet,      /\ ___/          
Edwin Eefting               /- \ _/  Business Internet Trends BV
                           /--- \/           __________________


_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users