Snort mailing list archives
Re: PureSecure is crazy
From: François Jan <fjan () wanadoo fr>
Date: 18 Jun 2002 23:54:02 +0200
Thanks a lot for answering.
unfortunately, the answer doesn't seem to match my situation.
I just went through the links pointed out by Robin (thanks to him) but I
don't seem to match this situation either because I seem to be in the
situation of the solution 1.
I will try to be more explicit this time so that maybe details that
don't seem relevant to me will give a clue to somebody. I fire psd on
the sensor by just calling /usr/local/puresecure/sensor/bin/psd and my
conf is
My MySQL schema is 105. The server hosting the sensor and the database
is hanoi.
psd.conf:
-------------------------------------------
sid = "1"
this_is_the_main_sensor = "yes"
db_user = "puresecure"
db_password = "<PASSWORD>"
db_host = "hanoi"
db_name = "snort"
db_port = "3306"
...
run_snort_locally = "yes"
snort_binary_path = "/usr/sbin/snort"
snort_interface = "ppp0"
snort_options = ""
auto_update_snort_rules = "yes"
...
base_path = "/usr/local/puresecure/sensor"
...
--------------------------------------------
snortppp0.conf
--------------------------------------------
var HOME_NET $ppp0_ADDRESS
var EXTERNAL_NET !$HOME_NET
...
output database: alert, mysql, user=puresecure dbname=snort
sensor_name=hanoi sid=1 password=<PASSWORD> host=hanoi
...
...
---------------------------------------------
and here is my snort_output.log:
---------------------------------------------
Log directory = /usr/local/puresecure/sensor/log/
Initializing Network Interface ppp0
--== Initializing Snort ==--
Rule application order changed to Pass->Alert->Log
Decoding raw data on interface ppp0
Parsing Rules file /usr/local/puresecure/sensor/conf/snortppp0.conf
Initializing Preprocessors!
Initializing Plug-ins!
Initializating Output Plugins!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Initializing rule chains...
No arguments to frag2 directive, setting defaults to:
Fragment timeout: 60 seconds
Fragment memory cap: 4194304 bytes
Stream4 config:
Stateful inspection: ACTIVE
Session statistics: INACTIVE
Session timeout: 30 seconds
Session memory cap: 8388608 bytes
State alerts: INACTIVE
Scan alerts: ACTIVE
Log Flushed Streams: INACTIVE
Stream4_reassemble config:
Server reassembly: INACTIVE
Client reassembly: ACTIVE
Reassembler alerts: ACTIVE
Ports:
21 23 25 53 80 110 111 143 513
Using LOCAL time
database: compiled support for ( mysql )
database: configured to use mysql
database: user = puresecure
database: database name = snort
database: sensor name = hanoi
database: password is set
database: host = hanoi
database: sensor id = 13
database: schema version = 105
database: using the "alert" facility
--== Initialization Complete ==--
-*> Snort! <*-
Version 1.8.6 (Build 105)
By Martin Roesch (roesch () sourcefire com, www.snort.org)
-------------------------------------------
and last psd.log:
-------------------------------------------
....
Tue Jun 18 23:27:20 2002 Appears to be an invalid ruleset / snort.conf
Tue Jun 18 23:27:20 2002 Finishing iteration # 41 , that took 0
seconds.
Tue Jun 18 23:32:21 2002 Starting iteration # 42 (5 min 1 sec since
the last run)
Tue Jun 18 23:32:21 2002 Appears to be an invalid ruleset / snort.conf
Tue Jun 18 23:32:22 2002 Finishing iteration # 42 , that took 1
seconds.
....
-------------------------------------------
Of course, I can give more information to anybody willing to help me.
François
Le mar 18/06/2002 à 16:17, Ian Macdonald a écrit :
They introduced a couple extra arguments in the mysql output module to help solve this problem. In the snort.conf file make sure you have on the output line sensor_name=YOURSENSOR and sid=YOURSENSORID. My looks like output database: alert, mysql, user=snort dbname=snort sensor_name=SENSOR-NIC2 sid=1 password=SNORTPASSWORD host=localhost hope this helps Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "François Jan" <fjan () wanadoo fr> To: <snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: [Snort-users] PureSecure is crazyHi, I tried to find the answer on this mailing-list but nobody seems to have ran into the same problem as me so I'm gonna explain it in hope somebody has a solution. I upgraded from demarc 1.05 to PureSecure 1.6 on a redhat 7.3. I run snort on ppp0 on one server and the console on another computer. When I first started, I noticed a sensor I didn't know of. I deleted it through the console but it keeps coming back with increasing sensor id. I looked into MySQL but couldn't understand where this sensor comes from. Since my psd.conf indicates sensorid = 1, I began to think about psd not using psd.conf. Another point : if I change snort options in this same file and I restart psd, it doesn't care about my options and uses the "-o -N" default. my psd.conf file is in the place it should be (/usr/local/puresecure/sensor/conf) and I really don't have a clue where to start from. Thanks. -- François Jan <fjan () wanadoo fr> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sponsor's Message ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list
--
François Jan <fjan () wanadoo fr>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<<
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- PureSecure is crazy François Jan (Jun 17)
- Re: PureSecure is crazy Ian Macdonald (Jun 18)
- Re: PureSecure is crazy François Jan (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PureSecure is crazy Robin Brown (Jun 18)
- Re: PureSecure is crazy Ian Macdonald (Jun 18)
