Snort mailing list archives
Re: Stoopid port syntax question
From: Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:22:33 -0400
"Kristopher Czachor" <czachor () syrres com> writes:
Whoa! Holy War and Peace Batman! Hmm, I see what you're trying to do and it's an interesting approach that I didn't even think of. Nonetheless I'd still like to be able to specify a group of ports in a future version. Since 1.9 is out of the question, maybe 1.10 or 2.0?
Yes we all do. In the 1.10 timeframe, "most likely" ;-) -- Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> A good pun is its own reword. ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Stoopid port syntax question Kristopher Czachor (Jun 26)
- Re: Stoopid port syntax question Erek Adams (Jun 26)
- Re: Stoopid port syntax question Bennett Todd (Jun 27)
- Re: Stoopid port syntax question Chris Green (Jun 27)
- RE: Stoopid port syntax question Kristopher Czachor (Jun 27)
- Re: Stoopid port syntax question Chris Green (Jun 27)
- Re: Stoopid port syntax question Bennett Todd (Jun 27)
- Re: Stoopid port syntax question Erek Adams (Jun 26)
