Snort mailing list archives
Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link
From: Holger.Woehle () arcor net
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 16:23:53 +0100
I think the problem is that you are only seeing one side of the conversation. Copper taps generally split the taped data into send and receive wires, So Tap A is one direction of the traffic and Tap B is the other. You can feed tap A and tap B into a switch that has port monitoring capabilities so you can recombine the traffic from Tap A and Tap B into a single cable. Or you can use a computer with 2 nic cards and perform channel bonding between the nic cards. Hope this helps Ian
You are right about the function of the Tap splitting the traffic. If i use bond0 with two devices on both Tap-ends everything works... So, why wouldn't i do that ? I have to observe a redundant ethernet infrastructur. For this reason i have to use bond0 to merge Tap A from two Taps. That means 2 x 100mbit, wich is a lot of traffic, but it works! If i try to catch the answers at Tap B, i have a bonding interface with 4 x 100mbit... only to be able to make stream assembly work. I think thats to high the price. But let us talk about that opinion: I don't need any rules observing the server answers. Does the backwarding traffic stresses snort heavily even without rules ? I think yes : Snort has to examine every packet so i think i would have a lot of paket losses, wouldn't i ? First i go for the asynchronous_link, but as a backup i test the 4 x bonding case. In the moment i have strange problems with a quad-ethernet d-link card, but that's another mailing list. cu holgi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Holger . Woehle (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Ian Macdonald (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Holger . Woehle (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
