Snort mailing list archives

Re: pass rules for one alert


From: John Sage <jsage () finchhaven com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:17:56 -0700

Addy:

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:39:21AM -0400, Night-Stalker wrote:
Hello everybody,

I have a simple question:
I want to ignore exactly one rule, that triggers false positives
from one host to another. To do so, I wrote an pass-rule like that:

pass tcp <source-ip> any -> <dest-ip> 21 (msg:"FTP command overflow
attempt"; flags:A+; dsize:>100; reference:bugtraq,4638;
classtype:protocol-command-decode; sid:1748; rev:3;)

This is looking at a packet payload size > 100; this is not specific
enough?

What *would* make it specific enough? See below...

I don't want to ignore all FTP-Data between these hosts, only the
FTP-Data that triggers this alert (thats means the pass-rule:
pass tcp <source-ip> any -> <dest-ip> 21
isn't precise enough. And ignores all FTP-Data.)

Is it possible to ignore exactly the FTP-Data between these Hosts,
that triggers that alert. I want the other FTP-Data between these
Hosts being scanned for other FTP-Exploits except the "FTP command
overflow attempt".

In a word, yes, but if you want help from anyone on this list you'll
have to tell *us* what "..exactly the FTP-Data between these Hosts.."
is, because until we know, no one can help you...


- John
-- 
"In those days, you could not buy a $2000 200MHz Pentium server."

PGP key:     http://www.finchhaven.com/pages/gpg_pubkey.html
Fingerprint: C493 9F26 05A9 6497 9800  4EF6 5FC8 F23D 35A4 F705


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: