Snort mailing list archives
Data Reduction
From: Brett.Gillett () tsx ca
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:35:50 -0500
Hey everyone,
This question is an extenstion to my last one about a bad SQL statement; I
think we have figured that out. I wanted to get everyone's thought on data
reduction.
What we want to do is store less data for more time, but we are having a
hard time actually deciding what to keep. We would like to come up with 3
stages,
1st stage - Snort DB
2nd stage - medium
3rd stage - long-term storage
We have come up with the following list for long-term storage,
timestamp,signature,sig_class_id,ip_src,tcp_sport,ip_dst,tcp_dport,ip_proto
What I am after are suggestions for the 2nd stage; in addition to above
what do you think would be worth keeping.
Thanks,
Brett
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Data Reduction Brett . Gillett (Nov 07)
