Snort mailing list archives
Re: Gigabit IDS report
From: Frank Knobbe <fknobbe () knobbeits com>
Date: 30 Nov 2002 23:23:17 -0600
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 21:27, twig les wrote:
Yeah, I went to the sight and left without it cause of that.
I put some fake information in it. That gets to the the write up, or some of it at least. Looks like you have to *pay* them for more information (such as the IDS test results). Are we now charging money for white papers? My God, what has this industry come to... Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Gigabit IDS report Bob Walder (Nov 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gigabit IDS report aaron g (Nov 30)
- Re: Gigabit IDS report twig les (Nov 30)
- Re: Gigabit IDS report Frank Knobbe (Nov 30)
- Re: Gigabit IDS report twig les (Nov 30)
- RE: Gigabit IDS report Bob Walder (Dec 01)
- Re: Gigabit IDS report [RANT WARNING] Michael Boman (Dec 01)
- RE: Gigabit IDS report Paul D. Shaffer (Dec 01)
- RE: Gigabit IDS report Frank Knobbe (Dec 01)
- RE: Gigabit IDS report aaron g (Dec 01)
