Snort mailing list archives
Re: Newbie questions, Snort on NT, stealth mode vs react/flexresp
From: Frank Knobbe <fknobbe () knobbeits com>
Date: 09 Oct 2002 16:25:49 -0500
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 08:41, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
[is it] possible to transmit packets from an interface that has no IP address assigned?Interesting question. If you are using a tap it's not possible AFAIK Prolbably depends on specific investigation of the "stealth" tap tho.
I don't see why not. After all, you can READ packets from the wire without having to have an IP address configured :) (using the pcap library). Likewise, using the libnet library, you can WRITE packets on the wire without a configured IP address. And therein lies the problem. If you really, absolutely, 100% do not want to be able to send packets, you need to use a tap that prevents transmission on the hardware layer. As Dragos said, with a tap you can not send resets. But afaik, you don't need to have an IP address configured for snort to send resets since snort uses the libnet library. I haven't looked closely at the code of flexresp and can not offer you any answer to questions like 'how does it know what adapter to use if my system is multi-homed' and similar questions. However, with a Google search, or a search through the snort archive, you might come across answers there. Cheers, Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Newbie questions, Snort on NT, stealth mode vs react/flexresp Dave Thornburgh (Oct 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Newbie questions, Snort on NT, stealth mode vs react/flexresp Dave Thornburgh (Oct 09)
- Re: Newbie questions, Snort on NT, stealth mode vs react/flexresp Dragos Ruiu (Oct 09)
- Re: Newbie questions, Snort on NT, stealth mode vs react/flexresp Frank Knobbe (Oct 09)
- Re: Newbie questions, Snort on NT, stealth mode vs react/flexresp Dragos Ruiu (Oct 09)
