Snort mailing list archives
Re: portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work???
From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:55:32 -0500
I don't know, but if you ever hear of anyone that's ever been able to do anything useful with spp_portscan2, let me know..
After weeks of trying to make it do something useful, I gave up on portscan2 completely and disabled it in my configuration. The thing consumes a significant chunk of memory, falses like crazy as seeing an "syn-ack scan" whenever a client opens a webpage with lots of embedded images, and doesn't seem to honor ignores in a manner that fixes the "syn-ack scan".
I wound up installing spade instead. At least it behaves sanely, although it requires some tweaking to work to my liking and it listens to what I tell it to ignore....
I also have significantly lower memory usage, and significantly lower packet losses with that setup (I'm running on low-end hardware).
At 04:16 PM 3/20/2003 -0500, Jeff Oliveto wrote:
Has anyone confirmed that the "preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports: s1 s2 d1 d2" variable works?I'm running snort v 1.9.1, and varified that the feature is in the spp_portscan2.c source.No matter how I specify the variable in the snort.conf file I can't get portscan2 to filter on the source or destination ports. Tried several different variations and none seem to have an affect (see examples below). BTW...the portscan2-ignorehosts variable does work in filtering on the source address.If it does work...what is the trick? ======== examples =============== Preferred configuration: preprocessor portscan2-ignorehosts: $HOME_NET preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports: s53 s80 s443 d53 d80 d443preprocessor portscan2: scanners_max 3200, targets_max 5000, target_limit 5, port_limit 20, timeout 60Alternate variations used during troubleshooting.... Removed ignorehosts and filter just on source/destination port...doesn't work: #preprocessor portscan2-ignorehosts: $HOME_NET preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports: s53 s80 s443 d53 d80 d443preprocessor portscan2: scanners_max 3200, targets_max 5000, target_limit 5, port_limit 20, timeout 60Reduce to one source port...doesn't work: preprocessor portscan2-ignorehosts: $HOME_NET preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports: s80preprocessor portscan2: scanners_max 3200, targets_max 5000, target_limit 5, port_limit 20, timeout 60Change position...doesn't work: preprocessor portscan2-ignorehosts: $HOME_NETpreprocessor portscan2: scanners_max 3200, targets_max 5000, target_limit 5, port_limit 20, timeout 60preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports: s53 s80 s443 d53 d80 d443 Jeff Oliveto
-------------------------------------------------------This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Jeff Oliveto (Mar 20)
- Re: portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Matt Kettler (Mar 20)
- Re: [Snort-users] portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Erek Adams (Mar 24)
- RE: [Snort-users] portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Jeff Oliveto (Mar 25)
- RE: [Snort-users] portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Erek Adams (Mar 24)
- Re: [Snort-users] portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Chris Green (Mar 26)
- RE: [Snort-users] portscan2-ignoreports...anyone get it to work??? Jeff Oliveto (Mar 25)
