Snort mailing list archives
corrupted packet traces?
From: "Sheahan, Paul (PCLN-NW)" <Paul.Sheahan () priceline com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:13:49 -0500
Hello, I'm using Snort Version 1.9.0 (Build 209) on RH Linux 7.0. Stats on my system show that NO packets are being dropped and all appears to be working normally. I created a custom rule to check for an internal domain name, which flagged a few hundred packets from web sessions. When I review the packet traces with people here, we all seem to think the packet traces CAN'T be valid web session packet traces. It almost appears as though the packet traces show one particular packet, though it is actually two unrelated packets lumped together or something (like information in the beginning of the packet doesn't have any relation to info at the end of the packet). I was wondering if anyone has seen such a thing before? Thanks, Paul Sheahan Manager of Information Security Priceline.com paul.sheahan () priceline com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- corrupted packet traces? Sheahan, Paul (PCLN-NW) (Jan 17)
