Snort mailing list archives
Re: Dangerous to use custom ruletypes?
From: Erek Adams <erek () snort org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:03:04 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Martin Olsson wrote:
Is it dangerous to use custom ruletypes? I just discovered that when you define your own ruletypes, they are put LAST in the chain of rules. Here is an example of the output when I run snort with the -o option (pass rules first): Rule application order: ->pass->activation->dynamic->alert->log->panic
[...snip...]
Little Known Snort Tidbit #324:
config order: panic pass activation dynamic alert log
Thank Andrew for that one. ;-)
Cheers!
-----
Erek Adams
"When things get weird, the weird turn pro." H.S. Thompson
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Dangerous to use custom ruletypes? Martin Olsson (May 14)
- Re: Dangerous to use custom ruletypes? Erek Adams (May 14)
- Re: Dangerous to use custom ruletypes? Martin Olsson (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Dangerous to use custom ruletypes? Neil Dickey (May 14)
- Re: Dangerous to use custom ruletypes? Erek Adams (May 14)
