Snort mailing list archives
Re: no RPM's?
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:57:39 -0400
2003-06-19T15:24:11 Daniel Wittenberg:
I was curious why there weren't any RPM's for 2.0 yet ? Is there no longer a maintainer?
If anybody wants some snort rpms, I've got a set I use.
Mine are organized as
snort --- the only binary rpm, the rest are noarch, delivers
/usr/bin/snort, snort(1), and a wad o' loose docs
into /usr/share/doc/snort-...
snort-doc --- delivers the snort user manual which I
mirrored down from snort.org
snort-run --- delivers init script, plus mkdirs
/var/log/snort
snortrules --- delivers /etc/snort from
snortrules-current.tar.gz, applying one patch to
make it work (editing RULE_PATH to /etc/snort), and
whatever other tuning I want (at the moment I'm just
#-ing out a couple of sids in bad-traffic.rules)
This structure is organized around a separate rpm for each source.
NB: I developed these for my own personal use; they reflect the
design decisions that suited me. I'm not currently equipped with
the resources to aggressively maintain these to attempt to address
everyone's needs. I won't mind hearing requests for changes, I just
might not honor 'em:-).
Anyone who wants them is welcome, they're published at
<URL:http://bent.latency.net/snort-rpms/>. Anyone is also welcome to
take my packaging work and do absolutely anything with it, including
putting their own name on it.
-Bennett
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- no RPM's? Daniel Wittenberg (Jun 19)
- Re: no RPM's? Bennett Todd (Jun 19)
