Snort mailing list archives
conversation/portscan oddity
From: "Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl () umb com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:02:31 -0500
If conversation is set to only allow protocol 1 (or 6 or 17), would portscan2 be allowed to generate portscan alerts for the protocols not allowed? I tested this theory today with allowed protocols 6 17 and was still able to get portscan2 to kick off alerts when doing pingscans (1 - ICMP). Is conversation broken? Does portscan2 even use conversation? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- conversation/portscan oddity Kreimendahl, Chad J (Sep 05)
