Snort mailing list archives
CIDR notation question
From: Rich Adamson <radamson () routers com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:42:31 -0600
A couple of us are having a discuss off list. Does anyone know (for a
fact) how snort treats CIDR notation?
var HOME_NET [172.16.0.0/23] implies 512 addresses, one broadcast
address (172.16.1.255), and 172.16.0.255 is a valid device address.
Is there any code that would assume natural subnet masks, or, analyze
packets in such a way as to assume 172.16.0.255 is treated differently?
Or, asking the question slightly different...
is var HOME_NET [172.16.0.0/24,172.16.1.0/24]
treated exactly the same as
HOME_NET [172.16.0.0/23]
when packets are analyzed?
Rich
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- CIDR notation question Rich Adamson (Jul 10)
- Re: CIDR notation question Matt Kettler (Jul 10)
- Re: CIDR notation question Chris Green (Jul 14)
