Snort mailing list archives
(no subject)
From: Russell Fulton <r.fulton () auckland ac nz>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:14:53 +1300
The network I=92m monitoring is quite big (actually it=92s huge). Every time works fine, until more than 32000 alerts (different IP=92s) aregenerated. When this happens, snort just stop probably because of an operating system restriction.=20
Yes, this is a fundamental constraint of the file system (number of files in a directory). Simple way to work around it would be to use a different logging format: either tcpdump, unified or log to a database. With so many alerts you may have performance problems with logging direct to a database. -- Russell Fulton /~\ The ASCII Network Security Officer \ / Ribbon Campaign The University of Auckland X Against HTML New Zealand / \ Email! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- (no subject), (continued)
- (no subject) Bob Apthorpe (Oct 28)
- (no subject) Kaplan, Andrew H. (Nov 04)
- Re: (no subject) Olaf Schreck (Nov 04)
- RE: (no subject) Kaplan, Andrew H. (Nov 05)
- RE: (no subject) Kaplan, Andrew H. (Nov 05)
- (no subject) CGhercoias (Dec 01)
- Message not available
- Re: (no subject) Matt Kettler (Dec 01)
- Message not available
- Re: (no subject) Jim Brown (Dec 01)
- (no subject) wfz (Dec 05)
- (no subject) Andrew Sergeyev (Dec 12)
- (no subject) Russell Fulton (Dec 12)
- (no subject) JP Vossen (Dec 19)
- (no subject) Kumar, Manoj (Dec 22)
