Snort mailing list archives
detecting fragmented portscan with snort 2.1.0
From: "Jochen" <dibo303 () gmx de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:08:52 +0100 (MET)
Hi, doing a portscan with e. g. nmap is logged as portscan by snort. Ok, fine. But doing a fragmented portscan only logs a "tiny fragments"-alert and NOT as 2nd alert a portscan. Why? The fraq2 preprocessor get's the pakets before flow-portscan because it is (logically) first listed in the snort.conf. So it genereates an alarm. But should the defragmented pakets that reach the flow-portscan preprocessor not generate an alarm, too? Or are alerts from two preprocessors on one packetstream not supported in Snort 2.1.0? Jochen -- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Bis 31.1.: TopMail + Digicam für nur 29 EUR http://www.gmx.net/topmail ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- detecting fragmented portscan with snort 2.1.0 Jochen (Jan 23)
