Snort mailing list archives
Re: Correct version of libpcap?
From: Christian Ehlen <Christian.Ehlen () gmx de>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:33:15 +0100
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 21:56, Sheahan, Paul wrote:
I'm currently running Snort 2.0.5 build 98 on RHLinux 8.0, and in a previous post when I asked about Snort dropping packets, someone mentioned that I should be sure I'm using "Phil Wood's version of libpcap". Can someone point me to the appropriate version of libpcap that I should be runnning? I've already applied as many tweaks as I could think of, and want to rule this out next.
I think you are searching for the turbopacket patch ... http://public.lanl.gov/cpw/ I think a *BSD system can also increase performance. -- GnuPG signed + encrypted messages welcome Key fingerprint = BFBE 3FD4 0C8B AA45 F6B6 6962 2FE7 A299 4675 1715 Public key can be found on keyservers (e.g. wwwkeys.de.pgp.net - keyID = 46751715)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Correct version of libpcap? Sheahan, Paul (Feb 02)
- Re: Correct version of libpcap? Erek Adams (Feb 02)
- Re: Correct version of libpcap? Christian Ehlen (Feb 03)
- Re: *BSD performance (was:Correct version of libpcap?) Martin Olsson (Feb 04)
- Re: Re: *BSD performance (was:Correct version of libpcap?) Christian Ehlen (Feb 07)
- Re: *BSD performance (was:Correct version of libpcap?) Martin Olsson (Feb 04)
