Snort mailing list archives

RE: Snort and high performance networks


From: "Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl () umb com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 13:11:51 -0500


FWIW... I've got systems that are easily handling between 3-4Gbps each.
That's partially hardware, partially OS, and a little tiny config work.
Very near to all rules enabled on these interfaces, as well as all of
the preprocessors (minus the broken ones), and a database output plugin.

0 dropped packets.   If you check the archives for this list, you'll
find discussions about kernels that can do polling against network
devices, and how this enhances snort performance on high speed links
(network performance in general, really).  I believe I mention the OSes,
maybe some config info and hardware used. 

If it's of any value, the machine I'm talking about above (handling
3Gbps) cost around $2500 (not sure if that's retail).

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Rapier [mailto:rapier () psc edu] 
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:32 AM
Cc: snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Snort and high performance networks


On May 20, 2004, at 11:45 AM, Kreimendahl, Chad J wrote:


Well, I'm sure there is a system out there that can handle this, but
my
question would be:  How in the world do you expect to get a 30GBps
connection pumped to unix/win machine?   Assuming Cisco device, you
might be able to pump 2 SPANS (at 1G each) to a sensor...   The other
two should be no problem... But that 30G on a single device... Rough
one.

Well, the 30GB is really just an example of the size of the networks I 
have to deal with. I don't actually think we can do much for that 
network Maybe after it gets broken up to different subnets inside of 
our network though. Anyway, the question was really about what the 
limits of snort are in terms of how much data it can handle assuming we 
can get that much data to it. Even with a minimal rule set on a fast 
unix box I wonder what we can pull off.

I think other people out there must have run across using snort on 
higher speed links (say 600 to 800Mbps) and I wonder what sort of 
problems they've encountered and if their solutions might scale up to 
even higher speeds.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.

Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: