Snort mailing list archives

Re: Re: How can I recognize Snort rules with high false positive rate?


From: Ali Zand <ali.zand () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:23:00 +0430

The goal of IDS tuning is to reduce FPs to an acceptable level, while
trying to avoid setting up your system for FNs.  This doesn't mean that
I believe that there are never FNs--it just means that an operator
should do everything possible to try and prevent them.

Taking the "I don't care about FNs" approach to tuning will usually
result in the operator carelessly disabling features and attack classes
in the name of getting rid of FPs, which will serve the immediate
purpose, but will likely result in a lot of missed legitimate detects as
well.

And when it all comes down to it, it's easy to dismiss FPs at the
analyst's console.  That's cheap compared to 50 FNs that were missed
because some entire attack class was slashed in the name or FP reduction.

I'm going to use Snort in combination with another IDS, and I want to
detect attacks which Snort supports but the IDS does not.
So considering :
1. having another IDS
2. having several FP messages on that IDS and having to process these
false messages
3. Very high false alerts will lessen analyst sensitivity, and he/she
will not care about them anymore.
I want to have just very accurate rules of Snort.
I'm trying just to strengthen my original IDS.

Thanks


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: