Snort mailing list archives
Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs
From: Wes Young <wcyoung () buffalo edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:29:09 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ahhhh.... pardon my ignorance... i understand now... thanks for the insight. :-) Dirk Geschke wrote: | Hi Wes, | | |>err not CID, sorry didn't have the table in front of me.. the sig_id. |> |>I realize that all the other tables are involved with the sig_id |>(obviously) hense the plugin re-write. Theoretically the SIG_SID and |>SIG_ID are the same, just diff values. Again, this is dealing with the |>SIGNATURE TABLE, everything now seems to rely on the SIG_ID instead of |>the SIG_SID, that was my whole point. So instead of auto-incrementing |>the SIG_ID in the table, make it equal to the SIG_ID upon insertion |>until we can safely get rid of it. | | | once more: Even this view is not correct at all... | | The SIG_ID and SIG_SID are not the same. The big difference is that | you may have the same signature ID with different revisions. Hence | the keyword "rev". But you also get a new SIG_ID if you change the | classification and more worse the priority. | | If you use several snort sensors it may be a good idea to use even | several priorities. A web attack in front of a mail server would | get a minor priority than against a webserver. | | So, there is a good reason for this. And I don't think that this | design is the bottleneck of the database. | | This is more the combination of the sensor ID and the counter per | sensor, hence the SID/CID pair. | | Best regards | | Dirk | | - -- Wes Young Network Security Analyst University at Buffalo GPG Key: http://saxjazman9-security.blogspot.com/2005/01/gpg-key.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSsXF1M5o0FsrrbERAmCzAJ0UqRXU2OULJONcYCAP5RbHCWjYVgCeLUUI uEdJIZ3vT/nwO8XIvI7ReiU= =uo9r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs, (continued)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Wes Young (Mar 14)
- RE: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Lee Clemens (Mar 14)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Joel Esler (Mar 21)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Wes Young (Mar 14)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Jerry (Mar 25)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Dirk Geschke (Mar 26)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Wes Young (Mar 26)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Dirk Geschke (Mar 29)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Wes Young (Mar 31)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Dirk Geschke (Mar 30)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Wes Young (Mar 31)
- Re: Base Barnyard and Unified Logs Paul Schmehl (Mar 14)
