Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Snort-devel] RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig
From: Martin Roesch <roesch () sourcefire com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:20:01 -0500
Hi Joel,That's exactly why, it's a lot faster and more compact to just use nice little 32-bit ints and do all the string handling "heavy lifting" as a post process. Unified was designed with one primary driver in mind: speed. It sucks to have to manage the sid-msg.map, but it's there for performance reasons...
I suppose if I was really cool I could have snort auto-generate the sid-msg.map file at start time based on the loaded rule set, but I'm not that cool (at least not this week)...
-Marty
P.S. What letters of the alphabet do we have left to use for this
one...?
On Dec 17, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Esler, Joel - Contractor wrote:
Sid-msg.map is only relevant if you are using barnyard. Why can't we get rid of sid-msg.map and have snort log the event name in unified? For speed I am assuming... Joel -----Original Message----- From: snort-sigs-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-sigs-admin () lists sourceforge net] On Behalf Of Lance Boon Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 3:21 PM To: snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net Subject: RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig Thanks for pointing that out here's the updated rule alert udp any any -> any any (msg:"Netop Remote Control Usage"; content:"|554b30303736305337473130|"; reference:url,www.netop.com; classtype:policy-violation; sid:2000000; rev:2;) This caught my traffic going to my remote subnets. I tried increasing the revision # as well but to no avail so I changed the sid to 2000001 alert udp any any -> any any (msg:"Netop Remote Control Usage"; content:"|554b30303736305337473130|"; reference:url,www.netop.com; classtype:policy-violation; sid:2000001; rev:1;) Now it's showing up in Acid correctly -----Original Message----- From: Matt Jonkman [mailto:matt () infotex com] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:10 PM To: Lance Boon Cc: snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig Not a bad run for a first sig. Thanks for posting it.Why did you go home-home net? Why not home-any? Or even any-any? I'm notthat familiar with the tool, but I'd think the most interesting traffic would be someone from the outside connecting to a local box. As far as why it doesn't show right in acid, not sure. It is crafted correctly. Try increasing the rev number and hitting it again. I wonder if maybe the first time you had a hit the msg was empty, in which case it won't take the new msg until the rev # increases. I'll put this up on bleeding snort for more testing after we sort out the reasons for the home-home. Matt Lance Boon wrote:This is my first attempt at writing a sig and wondered if anybody had any pointers. I got a pcap of a netop session to 2 different systems, ran it through snort and noticed that the content was the same on inoneparticular packet. So I wrote a rule for it, I have this working on my network right now and haven't had any false positives yet. The only thing that is bugging me and I'm sure that it's something that I'm missing is that when an alert hits it doesn't read "Netop RemoteControlUsage" on the acid page it just says [snort] Snort Alert [1:2000000:0] alert udp $HOME_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Netop Remote Control Usage"; content:"|554b30303736305337473130|"; reference:url,www.netop.com; classtype:policy-violation; sid:2000000; rev:1)-- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product GuideRead honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list Snort-devel () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel
-- Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO, Sourcefire Inc. - +1-410-290-1616 Sourcefire - Discover. Determine. Defend. roesch () sourcefire com - http://www.sourcefire.com Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: [Snort-devel] RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig Martin Roesch (Jan 05)
- Re: [Snort-devel] RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig Jeff Nathan (Jan 11)
