Snort mailing list archives
RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies
From: "Ferguson, Justin (IARC)" <FergusonJ () nv doe gov>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:11:16 -0700
good lord you fame mongering whores really need to get some skill.
Aren't you just capitalizing on it yourself?
Personally I try to make sure I am actually looking at the right code before I spout off. Then I take the time to verify what I believe. This shit is simply foolish. Of course I never disclose what I find so it doesn't matter for me.
Blackhat has just become another term for 'hasn't done anything'
A DOS in a non critical component without any chance of remote code execution is hardly worth this intellectual fart.
Non-critical to who? You? Believe it or not, some people, gasp, actually do use ASCII logging.
Maybe I got my CVS checkout from the wrong server or something but I
can't find more than one call in the snapshot I have
...snort-2.4.0/src/preprocessors $ grep PrintIPPkt spp_frag3.c
PrintIPPkt(stdout, defrag_pkt->iph->ip_proto, defrag_pkt);
Maybe, I grabbed my snapshot from snort.org, and as of my last email you could find it there to.
Ultimately It seems that he was right and you were wrong so perhaps you need to check your attitude and code at the door.
Oops, mistake on your part, its okay though I understand that we can't all be so bright as to get our sources from snort.org, and I'm used to dealing with ignorant and rude people, I do after all live in Vegas. The rest really isn't worth replying to, PHC spawned a million idiots like you running around pretending to be blackhats with cool netmasks like 'whiteh8.net', never actually doing anything and hiding behind the guise that you don't believe in disclosure to cover the fact that you haven't written nor found any exploits, and in the end you end up being just as bad as (most of) the whitehats, useless and ignorant. J. Ferguson Intrusion Analyst NNSA Information Assurance Response Center fergusonj () nv doe gov
BTW, you missed that we also call PrintTCPHeader in spo_alert_full.c, which is actually done in the default config case, so this is something you might want to worry about if you're using full alerting for whatever reason. For the record, the recommended alerting modes for a production sensor are unified, syslog or database.Thank you for adding to my point. This makes what 3 possible routes of execution + the -v route for a total of 4 without debugging, and 6 if debugging was to be enabled. Still quite a long ways from the 'only if you are using -v'.
So basically your point is you don't have a clue, are a superfluous twit, incompetent fame whore, and chump? Perhaps you just sit in your chair masturbating to captured porn all day and that is why you didn't have time to verify your specious shit. Give me your address and I will send you the lapjuicer so you can at least make a profit when you and your buddies get together. http://3eyes.co.uk/views/public/?doc=Lapjuicer Just my personal grumpy thoughts of the moment. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list Snort-devel () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (Sep 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (Sep 14)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (Sep 14)
- Re: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Martin Roesch (Sep 14)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Steven Sturges (Sep 19)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Steven Sturges (Sep 19)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Steven Sturges (Sep 19)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Steven Sturges (Sep 19)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (Sep 15)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (Sep 15)
- RE: Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (Sep 16)
