Snort mailing list archives
Re: Snort vs. gcc 4.1.0
From: Allen McIntosh <mcintosh () research telcordia com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:53:36 -0400
Allen McIntosh wrote:
Snort and gcc 4.1.0 don't get along.
A little further investigation shows that -fno-strict-aliasing makes the problem go away. Without it, the compiler thinks that "ph" and references to h[] in the expansion of in_chksum_tcp() do not point to the same memory. The fetch of h[3] gets moved ahead of the store to ph.dip, and Bad Things ensue.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Snort vs. gcc 4.1.0 Allen McIntosh (Apr 04)
- Re: Snort vs. gcc 4.1.0 Allen McIntosh (Apr 04)
