Re: dynamic (so) rules

["Nerijus Krukauskas" <nkrukauskas () gmail com>]

On 01/07/2008, chris ryan <chris.ryan () gmx de> wrote:
> chris ryan wrote:
> > Just for curiosity, can anybody explain that to me?
>
> Another related question is why the loaded(!) dynamic rules are not
> shown as active, while the corresponding libraries are (the path to the
> merged dynamic rules file is totally correct, and there is no error
> message at all):
<snip_error_blurb>

  Take a look at the article by Richard Bejtlich:
http://searchsecuritychannel.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid97_gci1299181,00.html.
  And then suit yourself with some drinks
(http://blog.joelesler.net/2008/02/snort-drinking-game-by-erek-adams.html)
as so_rules were already discussed in [snort-users]. Cheers! ;)

-- 
http://nk99.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users