Snort mailing list archives
Daemonlogger and BPF
From: "Randal T. RIoux" <randy () procyonlabs com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:15:07 -0400
I have a question about the file format for bpf filtering with Daemonlogger.
The syntax isn't described anywhere. However, this is what I know.
"port 80 and port 8080" works fine for the -f command line inclusion.
"port 80 and port 8080 and port 8181" throws this error:
expression rejects all packets
So, I guess my question really is: what is the proper formatting/syntax
for BPF usage in Daemonlogger?
Thanks!
Randy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Daemonlogger and BPF Randal T. RIoux (Jun 06)
- Re: Daemonlogger and BPF Jason Brvenik (Jun 06)
- Re: Daemonlogger and BPF Martin Roesch (Jun 06)
- Re: Daemonlogger and BPF Randal T. RIoux (Jun 06)
