Snort mailing list archives

Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody?


From: Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:10:17 -0400

That makes sense.  That's basically Marty's #2 point.  I'd say the
porn.rules files can be re-sid'ed (referencing Jason's problem) as VRT has
dropped those completely, as well as other improved rules can be re-sid.

J

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Martin Holste <mcholste () gmail com> wrote:

How about this: if a rule needs an update/change, then it gets created
as a new rule and the old one is disabled from now on until the GPL
set has been metamorphosized into either VRT/ET normal rule sets.

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Weir, Jason <jason.weir () nhrs org> wrote:
But in the case of this rule #1313 - VRT no longer distributes it..
They retired it - but ET still has at least 6 versions of it.

Say I'm a VRT subscriber, so I get their GPL rules - I also wanna run
the ET rules so I get their Open-NoGPL rules..  I don't get #1313 - what
else don't I get?

See the problem here - ET is already maintaining those rules and by
porting them to Suricata they have already forked them..

You can't push a Suricata only modification back up the chain to VRT.

The rule sets need to stand on their own...  And that means different
sid ranges across the board...

-J

-----Original Message-----
From: emerging-sigs-bounces () emergingthreats net
[mailto:emerging-sigs-bounces () emergingthreats net] On Behalf
Of evilghost () packetmail net
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:43 AM
To: Martin Roesch
Cc: emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net;
snort-users () lists sourceforge net; Matthew Jonkman
Subject: Re: [Emerging-Sigs] [Snort-users] GPL rules - who
maintains them?Nobody?

On 03/21/11 10:26, Martin Roesch wrote:
Am I missing a case here?

Yeah, this is an obtuse approach.  There are two ET rule
packs, Open and
Open-NoGPL.  They are just that, users of VRT who get the GPL
rules would use
Open-NoGPL.  ET-only folks would use Open, which would
include the GPL rules.

I don't understand the point behind re-SID and duplication,
patching, etc.  If
the changes made to a "ET" GPL rule make sense, why wouldn't
VRT want to
consider it for inclusion/update?  Vice versa.

There's no point to fork when adjustments are made to enhance
detection, improve
performance, or reduce false positives.  Why wouldn't VRT
want an improved rule?

Do you really suggest we ask dual-subscribers (VRT, and ET)
to run two sets of
the same rule, one stagnated and legacy, the other an updated
re-SID of the same
rule?

- -evilghost



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Please visit www.nhrs.org to subscribe to NHRS email announcements and
updates.
_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!

_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!




-- 
Joel Esler | http://blog.snort.org | http://vrt-blog.snort.org |
http://blog.clamav.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

Current thread: