Snort mailing list archives
Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1
From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopmart () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:58:31 +0000
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Seth Dunn <seth () d2ms com> wrote:
One other thing to look at:
Snort Config File: /data/config/etc/idpsnort01/snort.conf
Snort Path is: /usr/local/bin/snort
SO Output Path is: /data/config/etc/idpsnort01/so_rules/
And your error shows::
An error occurred: ERROR:
/data/config/etc/idpsnort01/rules/VRT-app-detect.rules(0) Unable to open
rules file
"/data/config/etc/idpsnort01/rules/VRT-app-detect.rules": No such file
or directory.
Is there a /rules/ or /so_rules/ folder in which PP is working with?
/so_rules/ directory configured under pulledpork.conf, exists:
root@plzfnsm01:/tmp# ls -la /data/config/etc/idpsnort01/so_rules
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 9 06:03 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 May 9 13:55 ..
but, pulledpork is working under:
Generating Stub Rules....
Generating shared object stubs via:/usr/local/bin/snort -c
/data/config/etc/idpsnort01/snort.conf
--dump-dynamic-rules=/tmp/tha_rules/so_rules/
An error occurred:
... and I don't understand why ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and
their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed
leaders in the field. The early access version is available now.
Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users
Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 JJ Cummings (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
