Snort mailing list archives
Re: RE : Re: high packet loss - low throughput
From: Michal Purzynski <michal () rsbac org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:55:16 +0200
On 7/19/13 2:32 PM, rmkml wrote:
Hi Michal, Sorry if I don't followed your all answers,What's cpu if you run all snort with "special" bpf for testing interrupt/network driver/pfring please? (Bpf like "tcp port 79")Send top result ?
It's in this email already.
Can you run a snort output statistics after one minute please? After 5mn ?
Sure, snort takes no more than 20-40% CPU, with a short spikes.
It's a new snort install or It's a snort upgrade? What cpu previously?
New install.
What's os you use please? Tunning? Sysctl ?
Nothing.
What's cpu if you run all snort without bpf and without rules/module please?Can you replace snort by tcpdump only for testing? Cpu results?
Errr?
Regards @Rmkml -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Michal Purzynski <michal () rsbac org> Date : A : snort-users () lists sourceforge net Objet : Re: [Snort-users] high packet loss - low throughput So, anyone got some ideas how to debug and improve the situation? Or should I just assume that snort isn't capable of handling a per process 30Mbit - I can see a 5% packet loss now. On 7/18/13 11:07 AM, Michal Purzynski wrote: > On 7/18/13 3:39 AM, waldo kitty wrote: >> On 7/17/2013 17:25, Michal Purzynski wrote: >>> On 7/17/13 11:01 PM, waldo kitty wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2013 16:04, Michal Purzynski wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I can see a strange results on a local snort installation. Either I >>>>> don't understand something or the statistics aren't precise. >>>>> Please help >>>>> me understand. >>>>> >>>>> It's an (expanding) two hosts snort setup with 2 x E5-2620 0 @ >>>>> 2.00GHz / >>>>> 64GB RAM each. >>>>> Intel x520 card. >>>>> Traffic is around 1Gbit to each host. >>>>> Around 3500 VRT only rules enabled. >>>>> 8 snort instances load balanced by the pf_ring. >>>> what else is this machine doing besides just snorting the traffic? >>> netsniff-ng, barnyard, snort and that's it. Part of a Security Onion, >>> but with most things (like Bro, argus, prads, etc) disabled.>>>>> The traffic loss is very high - up to 9% per instance (as reported by>>>>> Sguil which in turn read the snort logs and debug files). A single>>>>> instance gets from 90 - 150Mbits of traffic and from 10 - 20k pps. To >>>>> make it worse, the loss is not dependent on the traffic and/or pps at>>>>> all. Actualy, sometimes I get a 5% of loss on 50Mbits to a single >>>>> instance. >>>> what happens if you increase the number of snort instances which >>>> would thereby >>>> reduce the load on each of the instances? >>> I did it increasing from 6 to 8. And it won't help, really - if snort >>> cannot keep up with 50Mbit / instance stream... >> i'm not sure that it is snort, specifically... there is something >> causing the >> data to be flushed or lost before it has a chance to be processed... >> there are >> others running snort on pipes as large or larger... >> >> perhaps you are using protocol aware stream flushing and it needs >> tweaking? > Yes, it's enabled with the same settings. Reading about it and I don't > really want to disable it. >> >> ############################################### >> # Configure protocol aware flushing >> # For more information see README.stream5 >> ############################################### >> config paf_max: 16000 >> >> >> it may also be related to the timeout values in the stream5 settings?? >> >> > No idea, that's why asking here :) Everything is default. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-usersPlease visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- RE : Re: high packet loss - low throughput rmkml (Jul 19)
- Re: RE : Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RE : Re: high packet loss - low throughput Y M (Jul 19)
