Snort mailing list archives

Snort CPU consumptions


From: Balasubramaniam Natarajan <bala150985 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:35:18 -0500

Hi

Let us consider a snort signature with a CPU expensive PCRE match as show
below[1].

Would the PCRE consume a lot of CPU cycles if the entire traffic which this
snort saw is just port 80 to the HOME_NET ?

[1]
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 888 (msg:"Most CPU expensive PCRE";
pcre:"/.+/i"; rev:1; sid:100001)

My answer would be no ?  Is there any other contradicting answer to the
same ?  My doubt is due to the fact that I saw a peculiar case where the
traffic was not on port 888 and still this sort of a rule managed to bubble
up the worst performers in pref-profiling.

-- 
Regards,
Balasubramaniam Natarajan
www.blog.etutorshop.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Current thread: