
Snort mailing list archives
Snort CPU consumptions
From: Balasubramaniam Natarajan <bala150985 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:35:18 -0500
Hi Let us consider a snort signature with a CPU expensive PCRE match as show below[1]. Would the PCRE consume a lot of CPU cycles if the entire traffic which this snort saw is just port 80 to the HOME_NET ? [1] alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 888 (msg:"Most CPU expensive PCRE"; pcre:"/.+/i"; rev:1; sid:100001) My answer would be no ? Is there any other contradicting answer to the same ? My doubt is due to the fact that I saw a peculiar case where the traffic was not on port 888 and still this sort of a rule managed to bubble up the worst performers in pref-profiling. -- Regards, Balasubramaniam Natarajan www.blog.etutorshop.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- Snort CPU consumptions Balasubramaniam Natarajan (Jan 08)
- Re: Snort CPU consumptions Patrick Mullen (Jan 08)
- Re: Snort CPU consumptions waldo kitty (Jan 08)
- Re: Snort CPU consumptions Balasubramaniam Natarajan (Jan 08)
- Re: Snort CPU consumptions Balasubramaniam Natarajan (Jan 08)
- Re: Snort CPU consumptions waldo kitty (Jan 08)
- Re: Snort CPU consumptions Patrick Mullen (Jan 08)